Delayed breast reconstruction with expander-implant and autologous dermal matrix. An alternative applicable therapeutic in non irradiated tissues.
Portada revista Boliviana de cirugía plástica volumen 2 numero 8 de 2021
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Delayed breast reconstruction
expander–implant
autologous dermal matrix
fat graft

How to Cite

1.
Suárez Oyhamburú DL. Delayed breast reconstruction with expander-implant and autologous dermal matrix. An alternative applicable therapeutic in non irradiated tissues. RBCP [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 21 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];2(8):24-37. Available from: https://revistabolivianacirplastica.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/4

Abstract

Introduction and Objective.

Delayed breast reconstruction or post mastectomy has a transcendental importance in women´s life as well as part of the comprehensive and multidisciplinary treatment of breast cancer. Such aggression impacts on self-esteem and social functionality in women who for some reason were not undergoing immediate reconstruction. The objective is to describe the results achieved in mastectomized patients, through the expander-implant technique, autologous dermal matrix, fat graft and reconstruction of the nipple areola complex ( NAC) with autologous tissues.

Material and method.

It is a retrospective, longitudinal, observational and descriptive study of a small group of 5 non-irradiated mastectomized private patients who were not subjected to an immediate reconstruction at other medical centers. They came to the private practice referred by other mastologists-oncologists medical surgeons to be submitted to a delayed breast reconstruction with expander prosthesis in a 3 surgical times technique between April 2015 and October 2018.

Results.

The delayed breast reconstruction is usually performed with expander prosthesis and for those injured breasts that had been irradiated, we use autologous flaps. In 4 out of  5 patients we performed the reconstruction of the NAC, 3 were submitted to unilateral reconstruction and 2 were bilateral, 2 women had anatomical double lumen prosthesis, 3 had expander implant with remote port at which 2 were round and one anatomical. We presented only one case of deflation 3 years later after reconstruction. We didn´t report cases of fat necrosis nor infectious symptoms. We didn´t have any case of capsular contracture but only a single case of late seroma after 7 months’ post implant in a patient with unilateral reconstruction due to a traumatic incident.

Conclusion.

The delayed breast reconstructive technique with expander-implant, uses of autologous dermal matrix or own tissues for reconstructing the NAC, represents a good therapeutic option of low morbidity to patients who have not undergone post-mastectomy irradiation. We briefly believe that at a  National level there is  a lack of health policies and therapeutic behaviors that  could benefit women with breast cancer on this long path from a complete treatment of this disease to breast reconstruction and its social, labor and emotional reintegration, to unify criteria and protocols between public services, private services,  ministry of health, regional secretaries of  health and scientific societies such as Mastology and Plastic Surgery to support the few teams in breast reconstruction and optimize medical protocols to benefits the sick patient.

https://doi.org/10.54818/rbcp.vol2.n8.2021.4
PDF (Español (España))

References

Suárez Oyhamburú, D., Escobar Ugarte, R.: Uso de matriz dérmica autóloga en reconstrucción mamaria, un recurso accesible. Cir. Plást Iberolatinoam.2018, vol 44, no2, p. 169-176.

Phillips Brett T., Halvorson, Eric G.: Antibiotic Prophylaxis following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: What is the Evidence?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016, vol. 138 (4), p.151 -157.

Chirappapha, P. et al.: Evaluation of lipofilling in elderly patients with breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. Global Open. 2015, vol. 3: p.20-26.

Coleman, S.R., Saboeiro, A.P.: Fat grafting to the breast revisited: Safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007, 119: p. 775 -785; Discussion 786.

Del Vecchio, D., Bucky, L.P.: Breast augmentation using pre expansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, vol. 127: p.2441-2450.

Petit,J.I. et al.: Fat grafting after invasive breast cancer: a matched case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017, vol. 139 (6): p. 1292-1296.

Gutiérrez Gómez, C., Rivas León, B. and Cárdenas Mejía, A.: Reconstrucción mamaria con expansor tisular e implante: Indicaciones y experiencia en 24 casos. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam., Dic 2012, vol.38, no.4, p.323-328.

Sepulveda, S. Reconstrucción mamaria.: Rev. Med.Clin. Condes.2016, 27(1): 65-75.

Escriba JM, Pareja L, Galvez J, Melia A, Roca L, et al. Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005-2011).: BMC Res Notes.2014; 7: 587.

Rodríguez Martín, B., Vallejo Pascual, E., Diago Santamaría, V., Sierra Vega, M., Mures Quintana, M. J,. Cáncer de mama y reconstrucción en hospital de tercer nivel de Castilla y León, España.: Cir. plást. iberolatinoam., 2018, vol 44, no.2, p. 177-185.

Martí toro, E. et al. Un reto en reconstrucción mamaria.: Cir plást. iberolatinoam., 2012, 38(1):1-7.

Mayer, H.F., Loustau, H.D.: Capsular grafts and flaps in inmediate prosthesic breast reconstruction. Aesth plast surg. 2014, 38(1):129-138.

Henderson,S. et al.: Is vicryl mesh really a safe alternative to acellular dermis in tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr Surg. 2015, 135(5S):.S53.

Filiciani, S., Siemienczuk, G.: El uso de mallas parcialmente absorbibles como cobertura y sostén del polo inferior en reconstrucción mamaria. Rev Arg Cir Plast. 2015, 20(3):84-93.

Haddad-tame, J.L., Rincon-Lozano,R., Hesiquio-Silva, R.: Reconstrucción mamaria inmediata mediante la utilización de matriz dérmica acelular o dermis autóloga. An Med (mex). 2014, 59(1):48-53.

Darden, N.W. et al. Dermal autograft using donor breast as alternative to acellular dermal matrices in tissue expander breast reconstruction. A comparative review. : Ann Plast Surg.2017: 1-4.

Aguilera-Sáez, J. et al. Experiencia en reconstrucción mamaria inmediata con implante y matriz acelular de pericardio bovino tras mastectomía ahorradora de piel.: Cir plást. iberolatinoam., 2015, 41 (4):385-392.

Novo-Torres, A., Lorda-Barraguer, E. and Laredo-Ortiz, C. Coste de la Reconstrucción mamaria en la sanidad pública española según la técnica aplicada.: Cir plást. iberolatinoam. 2014, 40(1):13-20.

Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB, sarfati I, Ihrai T, Rietjens M, et al. The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study- Milan- Paris- Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures.: Plast. Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128 (2): 341-346.

Platt J, Baxter NN, McLaughlin J, Semple JL. Does breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer affect overall survival? Long-term follow-up of a retrospective population-based cohort. : Plast. Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(3): 468e-76e.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.